The on-going debate regarding the use of free and open source software in the Italian Public Administration (PA) seems to be coming to a satisfactory conclusion. Italian public administrations are now obliged to give priority to free and open source software. This preference, however, cannot be given without a "comparative assessment". One of the tasks of the Agency is indeed to establish procedures and criteria that will help to justify their choices in the acquisition of computer programs. In this light, last January the Agency for Digital Italy (Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale) convened a workgroup for all interested stakeholders, focusing on implementing the new software comparative assessment requirements pursuant to art. 68 of the Digital Administration Code (Legislative decree no. 82/2005). Their work was completed last month. Now, the Agency will launch a public consultation and will adopt a final text for the guidelines. These guidelines will provide the Italian PA with all the operational tools for the acquisition of software.
Public administrations in Italy and elsewhere in the European Union are expected to provide efficient services to businesses and citizens, to share software solutions, to discuss best practices, and to generally share their experiences. These are the goals of the Programme on Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA), a programme established by the European Commission.
That said, every public body has the same freedom that any non-public body has in determining whether to acquire, develop, and release software under conditions of free and open source software. This is due to the fact that all public administrations in Italy are obliged to distribute to any other public administration all software which has been developed by or for them, in source code and without any charges (called the Reuse Rule). This fits perfectly in an all-free software workflow, where distribution under the Reuse Rule is not restricted to the Italian public administrations, but is public, to everybody.
The purpose of the Italian PA, of course, is to serve the community and citizens according to the PA’s own goals and skills. For this reason, even when it engages or partners with external instrumental bodies, including those of non-public nature (such as joint ventures or wholly owned companies), the activity of the PA is never directed at making profits or at the acquisition of a market position. The activity may be carried out only to achieve the satisfaction of the public interest, and this is confirmed by the Reuse Rule.
As such, when a public administration makes, designs, develops, and distributes software, the value of the software is not of a commercial nature. The value lies in its use, namely in the ability to make the administrative apparatus and the fulfillment of its own mission more efficient. In other words, for that public administration and the Italian PA as a whole, software is not a product. Rather, it is a service.
For the public administration, it is important that the software works only for the purpose for which it was procured. Beyond that, its value is irrelevant. As such, the return on investment is measured essentially in terms of efficiency. Efficiency which, in turn, must be measured both in immediate terms (saving of resources with an equal output or increased output utilizing the same resources), in long-term savings (lower cost for the update, adaptation, migration to the achievement of obsolescence or the appearance of more efficient systems), and in terms of positive effects to the general or local economy (spillover effects).
The recent changes ensure that public administrations have the right to acquire software under conditions of free and open source software. There is no doubt about this. Both in the case of a pure acquisition of pre-packaged software (generic), as a simple office application (typical examples: an Internet browser, a word processor, an email client or an operating system), but also if the software is being acquired by the Italian PA through ad hoc customization, where there is a substantial economic investment and in which the software is subject to the rules on re-use.
All of these concepts have been upheld by the Italian Constitutional Court in 2010, with Decision no. 122 of March 22. In essence, free and open source software does not refer to a particular technology, brand, or product, but rather expresses a legal feature. What differentiates free and open source software from proprietary software is the different licensing rights of the programs. Decisions about the adoption of one or the other contractual setting belongs to the user, hence, to the Italian Public Administration—which now has a strong preference for the free and open source software way.
_________________
an article by Guglielmo Troiano (website); original source posted 11 Nov 2013 and available on www.opensource.com under a CC by-sa license.
You may also be interested in "Free and open source software in the Italian public administration: fundamental law principles" by Simone Aliprandi and Carlo Piana: read the article.
Public administrations in Italy and elsewhere in the European Union are expected to provide efficient services to businesses and citizens, to share software solutions, to discuss best practices, and to generally share their experiences. These are the goals of the Programme on Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA), a programme established by the European Commission.
That said, every public body has the same freedom that any non-public body has in determining whether to acquire, develop, and release software under conditions of free and open source software. This is due to the fact that all public administrations in Italy are obliged to distribute to any other public administration all software which has been developed by or for them, in source code and without any charges (called the Reuse Rule). This fits perfectly in an all-free software workflow, where distribution under the Reuse Rule is not restricted to the Italian public administrations, but is public, to everybody.
The purpose of the Italian PA, of course, is to serve the community and citizens according to the PA’s own goals and skills. For this reason, even when it engages or partners with external instrumental bodies, including those of non-public nature (such as joint ventures or wholly owned companies), the activity of the PA is never directed at making profits or at the acquisition of a market position. The activity may be carried out only to achieve the satisfaction of the public interest, and this is confirmed by the Reuse Rule.
As such, when a public administration makes, designs, develops, and distributes software, the value of the software is not of a commercial nature. The value lies in its use, namely in the ability to make the administrative apparatus and the fulfillment of its own mission more efficient. In other words, for that public administration and the Italian PA as a whole, software is not a product. Rather, it is a service.
For the public administration, it is important that the software works only for the purpose for which it was procured. Beyond that, its value is irrelevant. As such, the return on investment is measured essentially in terms of efficiency. Efficiency which, in turn, must be measured both in immediate terms (saving of resources with an equal output or increased output utilizing the same resources), in long-term savings (lower cost for the update, adaptation, migration to the achievement of obsolescence or the appearance of more efficient systems), and in terms of positive effects to the general or local economy (spillover effects).
The recent changes ensure that public administrations have the right to acquire software under conditions of free and open source software. There is no doubt about this. Both in the case of a pure acquisition of pre-packaged software (generic), as a simple office application (typical examples: an Internet browser, a word processor, an email client or an operating system), but also if the software is being acquired by the Italian PA through ad hoc customization, where there is a substantial economic investment and in which the software is subject to the rules on re-use.
All of these concepts have been upheld by the Italian Constitutional Court in 2010, with Decision no. 122 of March 22. In essence, free and open source software does not refer to a particular technology, brand, or product, but rather expresses a legal feature. What differentiates free and open source software from proprietary software is the different licensing rights of the programs. Decisions about the adoption of one or the other contractual setting belongs to the user, hence, to the Italian Public Administration—which now has a strong preference for the free and open source software way.
_________________
an article by Guglielmo Troiano (website); original source posted 11 Nov 2013 and available on www.opensource.com under a CC by-sa license.
You may also be interested in "Free and open source software in the Italian public administration: fundamental law principles" by Simone Aliprandi and Carlo Piana: read the article.
Great decision for a great country. I hope Italy will inspire Quebec and Canada. We are trying to show that this the economic and technological path to go. We are entangled up to the nose in proprietary software from big companies. Their lobbying is very powerfull and we live difficult time as Quebec is going to buy Windows 8.1 for 466,000 desktops in public services without even giving a try to open source. This is all against their own law they made to consider open-source first... But may be "common sense will prevail" eventually. Good luck to Italy Something is rotten in the state of Quebec...
ReplyDelete